PDA

View Full Version : Mets handled Randolph firing like a bunch of cowards


Bear
06-17-2008, 12:12 PM
Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008 8:25 am EDT

Cowards. That's what the New York Mets upper management has become. Huge cowards who care more about appearance, public relations and their own personal reputations than the performance of their team. Fire your manager via a mass e-mail to the media at 3:11 a.m.? Yuck. You know what this reeks of? Someone made this decision days ago and agonized for hours on how to announce it to the public in the best way possible to keep the pressure off their own self wrote Jim Baumbach of Newsday.

Is it Omar Minaya or is it Jeff Wilpon? It's one of the two. Today, we see firsthand Corporate America joining hands with a Major League Baseball team, 21rst century style. It used to be that teams did firings and and announced negative news on Fridays, because the Saturday newspaper is the smallest and least read by the people who buy their tickets and paraphernalia. But in this day and age where news hits the Internet in minutes and the news cycle is endless, the Friday bad news game is meaningless. So what do the Mets do? They wait until their team heads to the West Coast, wait until their fans are in bed, wait until Randolph returns to the hotel and fire him then.

This is not about whether this was the right move. Randolph probably deserves to get fired based on how much this team has under-performed for the past year-plus. But Randolph deserved better than how the Mets handled this, and so did the players and the fans.

Source: Newsday


My questions are did Randolph deserve to get fired, and will it make any difference durning the 2008 season? I am not so sure.:shrug:

McCovey
06-17-2008, 12:24 PM
Yes, he deserved to get fired. With the September '07 collapse and the Mets struggles this season it seems Randolph has lost the ear of his players.

Bear
06-17-2008, 01:38 PM
Yes, he deserved to get fired. With the September '07 collapse and the Mets struggles this season it seems Randolph has lost the ear of his players.

But would it have been better to finish the year and then replace him. In my mind it is better to start the year fresh with a new manager than to take over someone else team in a death spheral.:confused:

McCovey
06-17-2008, 02:53 PM
But would it have been better to finish the year and then replace him. In my mind it is better to start the year fresh with a new manager than to take over someone else team in a death spheral.:confused:
It depends. What do the Mets think they can accomplish this season? If the think the can make a run then, yes, getting rid of Randoph makes sense. If they thought they were not going to make a run then they probably would have kept Randoph. The 2003 Marlins replaced Jeff Torborg with Jack McKeon in mid May. McKeon led the Marlins to a World Series title. Randolph simply wasn't the right man to manage this team anymore.

Bear
06-17-2008, 03:54 PM
It depends. What do the Mets think they can accomplish this season? If the think the can make a run then, yes, getting rid of Randoph makes sense. If they thought they were not going to make a run then they probably would have kept Randoph. The 2003 Marlins replaced Jeff Torborg with Jack McKeon in mid May. McKeon led the Marlins to a World Series title. Randolph simply wasn't the right man to manage this team anymore.

Whatever! BTW this is not mid-May.:nono: